College of Information and Computer Science, Long Island University
Published by July 12th, 2008
in internet and censorship.
0 Comments
Rant all you want in a public park. A police officer generally won’t eject you for your remarks alone, however unpopular or provocative. Say it on the Internet, and you’ll find that free speech and other constitutional rights are anything but guaranteed.
Read the full article here
Published by May 26th, 2008
in American Library Association, books and censorship.
0 Comments
For a second consecutive year, Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell’s award-winning And Tango Makes Three, a children’s book about two male penguins caring for an orphaned egg, tops the list of ALA’s 10 Most Challenged Books of 2007. Three books are new to the list: Olive’s Ocean, by Kevin Henkes; The Golden Compass, by Philip Pullman; and TTYL, by Lauren Myracle.
Read the full article here
Published by April 6th, 2008
in information, censorship and databases.
0 Comments
A U.S. government-funded medical information site that bills itself as the world’s largest database on reproductive health has quietly begun to block searches on the word “abortion,” concealing nearly 25,000 search results. Called Popline, the search site is run by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Maryland. It’s funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, the federal office in charge of providing foreign aid, including health care funding, to developing nations.
Read the full article here
Read Johns Hopkins’ response here
Published by April 6th, 2008
in education, digital and censorship.
0 Comments
Last year, the Court ducked an opportunity to determine in Morse v. Frederick whether public schools have authority to restrict student speech that occurs off of school grounds. The Court’s refusal to address this issue was unfortunate. For several decades lower courts have struggled to determine when, if ever, public schools should have the power to restrict student expression that does not occur on school grounds during school hours. In the last several years, however, courts have struggled with this same question in a new context — the digital media. Around the country, increasing numbers of courts have been forced to confront the authority of public schools to punish students for speech on the Internet. In most cases, students are challenging punishments they received for creating fake websites mocking their teachers or school administrators or for making offensive comments on websites or instant messages. More often than not, the lower courts are ruling in favor of the schools.
Read the full article here
\
Published by March 29th, 2008
in China, Pew Research, internet and censorship.
0 Comments
Many Americans assume that China’s internet users are unhappy about their government’s control of the internet, but a new survey by Chinese researchers finds most Chinese say they approve of internet regulation, especially by the government.
Read the full article here
Published by March 3rd, 2008
in YouTube and censorship.
0 Comments
Millions of YouTube fans around the globe lost access to the video sharing site that has come to define new media. But the blame could not be laid at the feet of the site’s rivals; instead, Sunday’s outage was blamed on the Pakistani government, which attempted to block the site because of offensive content. According to a Washington Post report, YouTube, which was only to be shut down in Pakistan, became a worldwide casualty when a local telecom company charged with muzzling the site inadvertently identified itself as the fastest route to YouTube. The result was that all traffic — as opposed to just Pakistani traffic — was sent to a “black hole.”
Read the full article here
Published by January 5th, 2008
in YouTube, China, video and censorship.
0 Comments
China has decided to restrict the broadcasting of Internet videos — including those posted on video-sharing Web sites — to sites run by state-controlled companies and require providers to report questionable content to the government. It wasn’t immediately clear how the new rules would affect YouTube and other providers of Internet video that host Web sites available in China but are based in other countries.
Read the full article here
Published by December 29th, 2007
in information and censorship.
0 Comments
Congress has finally adopted legislation that promises to cut through much of the red tape and outright obstructionism that often hampers requests for public information under the federal Freedom of Information Act. Among other things, the bill sets up a tracking system for FOIA requests that take longer than 10 days to process. It also penalizes agencies for sluggish responses to requests for information (which have been known to drag on for 20 years).
Read the full article here
Published by December 16th, 2007
in YouTube, China and censorship.
0 Comments
By any reckoning, China should be an important new territory for YouTube. The country is the world’s second-largest Internet market, after the U.S., it’s rapidly beefing up its broadband infrastructure, and it’s home to millions of Net-savvy youths who love posting videos online. The Backdorm Boys, a Chinese-student singing duo, was one of the first breakout hits from online video, with their lip-synching clips recorded in their dormitory room winning fans worldwide. Moreover, YouTube owner Google (GOOG) is making a big push in the mainland, poaching top Microsoft (MSFT) executive Kai-Fu Lee two years ago to spearhead the search engine’s drive into China. In October, YouTube made its first moves in Greater China, launching Chinese versions in Hong Kong and Taiwan in October. But in China, YouTube is conspicuous by its official absence. It hasn’t launched a mainland service yet and Chinese who log onto the company’s U.S. site from China often complain that the site is inaccessible.
Read the full article here
Published by December 9th, 2007
in Yahoo and censorship.
0 Comments
For a company that ostensibly believes in the Internet’s liberating power, Yahoo has a gallingly backward understanding of the value of free expression. The company helped Beijing’s state police uncover the Internet identities of two Chinese journalists, who were handed 10 years in prison for disseminating pro-democracy writings. Testifying before Congress last year about one case, Yahoo’s legal counsel said the company was unaware of the nature of the investigation. Did he miss the language about providing “state secrets to foreign entities” — a red flag for a political prosecution?
Read the full article here
Published by December 1st, 2007
in YouTube and censorship.
0 Comments
Video sharing website YouTube is refusing to filter out threatening material, despite calls for more restrictions in the wake of the school shooting in Finland. Pekka-Eric Auvinen, 18, used YouTube to publicise his plans to attack his high school in Tuusula, hours before he killed eight people then shot himself. But Peter Fleischer, privacy counsel at Google, which bought YouTube last year, said the website was not considering passing more information to the police to avert such events. “Logistically we couldn’t do pre-screening,” he said. “We don’t want to become censors of the web.”
Read full article here
Published by December 1st, 2007
in research, digital and censorship.
0 Comments
In an information society, wealth and power are increasingly linked to access to knowledge and control over telecommunications media. Struggles over access to digital media in particular are presenting uniquely contentious First Amendment problems. The creation of about 200 million blogs worldwide has triggered legal action and legislative reform aimed at alleged trademark infringement by bloggers and cybersquatters. Authors and publishers seek expanded rights to curtail unauthorized digital uses for which they are not being compensated, and have sued Google for digitizing and indexing tens of millions of the world’s books and periodicals. Finally, Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, and other Internet and e-commerce firms are trying to beat back plans by the nation’s cable and telephone companies to finance upgrades to their networks by levying discriminatory fees on search engines, as well as on Internet content providers and aggregators. Internet users have often been on the losing side of these controversies, as the economic model increasingly adopted by the Supreme Court is that in order to reward corporations for collecting or disseminating information, its free flow in print and electronic form must often be impeded, and its cost to the user increased. This model threatens to empower broadband companies, copyright holders, and trademark owners to restrict the right of the public to utilize digital media for purposes of free speech.
Read full article here
Published by November 3rd, 2007
in Library of Congress and censorship.
0 Comments
Librarian of Congress James H. Billington linked the free flow of knowledge to the spread of freedom around the world during a speech Oct. 30 at Wake Forest University’s Fall Convocation in Wait Chapel. In an address titled “The Future of Freedom,” Billington traced the development of freedom in the United States as “our most cherished national ideal” and examined the challenges posed today by short-term thinking as well as the opportunities afforded by new information technologies.
Read full article here
Published by October 27th, 2007
in China, internet and censorship.
0 Comments
At first, Liu Xiaoyuan just fumed when his online journal postings disappeared with no explanation. Then he decided to do something few if any of China’s censored bloggers had tried. He sued his service provider. Liu’s frustration is hardly unique. For China’s 162 million Web users, surfing the Internet can be like running an obstacle course with blocked Web sites, partial search results, and posts disappearing at every turn.
Read the full article here
Published by September 29th, 2007
in libraries, American Library Association, censorship and prisons.
0 Comments
According to the New York Times, the Standardized Chapel Library Project, an initiative of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, intends to bar access to library materials that, according to the Bureau of Prisons, ”discriminate, disparage, advocate violence or radicalize.” The initiative was created in response to concerns that prisons were becoming recruiting grounds for militant Islamic and other religious groups. The policy requires chaplains to remove books from chapel libraries unless the book appears on a list of 150 approved texts. The program has resulted in the elimination of thousands of religious texts from prison chapel libraries that were purchased by the prisons, or donated by churches and religious groups.
Read the full article here
Published by September 22nd, 2007
in Second Life, American Library Association, virtual worlds, Facebook, MySpace and censorship.
0 Comments
The American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) is pleased to announce Banned Books Week activities for librarians and the general public in virtual worlds Second Life, Teen Second Life and on social networking sites MySpace and Facebook. ALA is working with other library partners to provide an interactive experience centered on Banned Books Week, September 29-October 6, 2007, to help librarians and others to feel comfortable in social networking spaces and to reach out to new audiences. Partners include Alliance Library System, Alliance Second Life Library, TAP Information Services and the new ALA membership group Virtual Communities and Libraries.
Read the full article here
Published by September 22nd, 2007
in Google and censorship.
0 Comments
There are several reports across multiple forums about a large update at Google. It appears people are noticing large search results shifts at Google Web Search. Some are obviously happy with the changes, such as one user at Search Engine Watch Forums and an other user at DigitalPoint Forums and some are not. A WebmasterWorld thread has been tracking this update in more detail.
Read the full article here
Published by September 22nd, 2007
in YouTube and censorship.
0 Comments
Thailand is seeking to block clips on video-sharing Web site YouTube that accuse the chief royal adviser of masterminding last year’s bloodless coup, a top Justice Ministry official said on Friday. The government, which lifted a five-month ban on YouTube in August after it agreed to block clips deemed offensive to revered King Bhumibol Adulyadej, was seeking a court order to block two video clips posted recently on www.youtube.com.
Read the full article here
